ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Structural elements and theoretical logic of the ought-to L2 self: an inductive theory-building analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The ought-to L2 self, a key component of the L2 Motivational Self System, has predominantly been conceptualized as a single-dimensional variable in quantitative research, leaving its internal structure and operational logic under-theorized. This study addresses this gap by deconstructing the ought-to L2 self and constructing a theoretical model of its structural elements and theoretical logic. Methods: Adopting an inductive theory-building analysis informed by grounded theory coding procedures, this study conducted a systematic analysis of a diverse and topic-focused dataset that included academic monographs, peer-reviewed journal articles, and learners' discussions from online platforms. Results: Through iterative open, axial, and selective coding, the conventionally single-dimensional construct was decomposed into a tripartite model. Ten main categories were identified in the coding: career development motivation, academic development motivation, language capital motivation, motivation from significant others, social regulation pressure, internalization of obligation, anticipatory emotions activation, discrepancy perception, strategic learning engagement, and habituated practice. These categories cluster into three dimensions: external drivers, psychological processing, and behavioral responses, which collectively demonstrate the construct's inherently blended motivational nature. Discussion: This study further advances the exploration of the dimensionality of the ought-to L2 self, demonstrating that this construct possesses a blended motivational nature rather than a fixed prevention focus. Practically, it provides L2 educators with conceptual references that may inform possible pedagogical directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.