ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Life and experience as irreducible dimensions of nature.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Space and time are irreducible dimensions of nature-measurable but not derivable from anything more fundamental. Life and experience are here proposed as similarly irreducible dimensions. Together-sometimes referred to as lifeexperience to mark their inseparability-they constitute the dimensional ground from which emerges the Force of Experience-proposed as a candidate fifth fundamental force requiring further physical specification-whose causal reality is evidenced by the entirety of human civilization and all its products, for good and ill. Physics has failed to explain consciousness and life because it treats them as phenomena to be derived from lower-level processes, rather than recognizing them as foundational dimensions in their own right. Correcting this framing recasts both hard problems at once-not as derivation problems to be solved but as recognition problems to be addressed. Four converging arguments support these claims. First, the dimensional argument: Life and experience meet the same criteria for foundational status as space and time-they are causally real, irreducible, and known through inhabitation rather than external observation alone. Second, the AI argument: Information processing of extraordinary sophistication does not generate experience, providing an existence proof that something beyond computation is required. Third, the Now Problem: The present moment-the most certain datum of experience-has no place in the formalism of physics, a structural absence pointing to a dimension physics does not contain. Fourth, 33 years of clinical evidence: A single brain contains two selves independently accessing the experiential dimension, with therapeutic consequences for anxiety, depression, and opioid use disorder sufficient to earn FDA Breakthrough Device Designation. The Subjective Field is hypothesized as the physical mechanism linking the life dimension to the experiential dimension-transforming coherent living brain information into feelable information that can be received and actualized by the self. The field is physical and potentially discoverable; it takes brain information across a dimensional boundary. No physical instrument can yet follow this process. The hard problems are not solved by finding a better mechanism. They are reframed by recognizing that dimensions do not require mechanisms for their existence-they require only recognition of their irreducibility. The hard problems are addressed not by mechanism but by recognition-and from that recognition the hypothesized Subjective Field and Force of Experience, and the reported clinical evidence of two selves, take their proper place: not as derivations of consciousness from physics, but as features of a reality in which experience is foundational.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.