Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519395›Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Oncology2026

Pediatric AML CAR T cell therapy.

Anand S Bhagwat, Swati Naik

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anand S BhagwatDivision of Oncology and Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Swati NaikDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the second most common leukemia in children. Although survival rates have improved over several decades, for patients with high-risk or chemotherapy-refractory AML, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only curative therapy. HSCT provides immune-mediated control of residual leukemia through the graft-versus-leukemia effect, underscoring the importance of allogeneic immune responses in achieving durable remission for children with AML. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are genetically engineered T lymphocytes that express synthetic receptors combining antigen recognition with T cell activation and costimulatory signaling domains. By recognizing tumor antigens independently of MHC, CAR T cells can mediate potent cytotoxicity. CD19-directed CAR T cells have transformed outcomes for pediatric patients with relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia but translating CAR T cell therapy to AML has proven challenging. This review summarizes clinical experiences to date with AML-directed CAR T cells, highlighting pediatric data. We also review barriers to successful translation of AML CAR T cell therapy that have been identified in basic and translational studies. Finally, we discuss emerging strategies to improve efficacy, including advanced CAR designs, optimized antigen and patient selection, and rational combination approaches.

Indexed as

acute myeloid leukemiacell therapychimeric antigen receptorpediatrics

Identifiers

PMID42519395
PMCPMC13382590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.