Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519305›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026

Structural and functional dissection of neutralisation differences among SARS-CoV-2 variants using antigenicity prediction and CR3022 binding analysis.

Jyoti Sawant, Ajit Patil, Madhuri Thakar, Swarali Kurle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jyoti SawantICMR-National Institute of Translational Virology and AIDS Research, Pune, India.
Ajit PatilICMR-National Institute of Translational Virology and AIDS Research, Pune, India.
Madhuri ThakarICMR-National Institute of Translational Virology and AIDS Research, Pune, India.
Swarali KurleICMR-National Institute of Translational Virology and AIDS Research, Pune, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Progressive waves of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have been driven by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants carrying mutations in the spike glycoprotein, particularly in immunodominant regions such as the receptor-binding domain (RBD) and the N-terminal domain (NTD). These mutations can alter antigenic surfaces and are associated with changes in antibody recognition and vaccine-induced protection. Integrating experimental neutralisation data with computational analyses may contextualise variant-associated differences in antibody responses. Methods: Neutralisation responses were evaluated using a pseudovirus-based luciferase reporter assay including SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins from B.1 (Wuhan), B.1.617.2, AY.2 (Delta), and B.1.1.529 (Omicron). Plasma samples from three cohorts: naturally infected (I), vaccinated (V), and vaccinated-infected individuals (V+I), along with RBD-directed monoclonal antibody CR3022, were assessed to determine neutralizing titres (NT50). In parallel, spike sequences were analysed using epitope prediction, antigenicity profiling, and structural modelling. Docking simulations of CR3022 with variant RBDs were performed using HADDOCK, and binding parameters were estimated using PRODIGY. Results: Neutralisation responses varied across cohorts and viral variants, reflecting differences in immune exposure history. Plasma from V group individuals showed comparatively higher neutralisation titre, whereas B.1.617.2 and B.1.1.529 exhibited reduced susceptibility to neutralisation by infection-elicited antibodies. Computational analyses indicated variant-associated differences in predicted antigenicity and epitope landscapes within the RBD and NTD. Structural modelling and docking suggested that spike mutations may influence the CR3022-RBD interaction interface, with corresponding changes in predicted binding affinity across variants. These computational observations provide structural context for experimentally observed trends in reduced neutralisation but do not establish a direct mechanistic relationship. Conclusion: This study provides a combined experimental and computational characterization of SARS-CoV-2 variant-specific neutralisation across infection, vaccination and hybrid immunity-driven cohorts. The integration of pseudovirus neutralisation data with structural and in silico analyses offers a hypothesis-generating framework to contextualize observed differences in antibody responses and epitope recognition across variants.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Spike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMutationNeutralization TestsProtein BindingAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2antigenicityB-cell epitopesCR3022immune escapeneutralizing antibodiesRBD mutationsSARS-CoV-2vaccine-induced immunity

Identifiers

PMID42519305
PMCPMC13381479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.