Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519302›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026

Development and Interpretation of Machine Learning Models for Short-Term Functional Recovery and 90-Day Readmission in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease.

Jianzhou Tian, Li Tian, Qianqian Xie, Siru Zhang, Xiang Li, Shuxin Liu, Hualin Zhang, Yi Feng, Jun Shen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jianzhou Tian *Department of Cardiology, Arteriosclerosis Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Medical Research Center of Hubei Province, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Li Tian *Department of Cardiology, Arteriosclerosis Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Medical Research Center of Hubei Province, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Qianqian XieThe Third Clinical College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0005-4073-779X
Siru ZhangThe Third Clinical College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Xiang LiThe Third Clinical College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Shuxin LiuThe Third Clinical College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Hualin ZhangThe Third Clinical College, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Yi FengDepartment of Cardiology, Arteriosclerosis Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Medical Research Center of Hubei Province, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.
Jun ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Arteriosclerosis Cardiovascular Disease Clinical Medical Research Center of Hubei Province, Renmin Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, 442000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-5446-5757

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early prediction of functional recovery and post-discharge readmission may support multidisciplinary rehabilitation planning, follow-up stratification, and individualized management in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study aimed to develop and interpret machine learning (ML) models for predicting 1-week functional recovery and 90-day readmission. Methods: A total of 553 CVD patients were randomly assigned to a training cohort (n=388) and a test cohort (n=165). Candidate clinical, functional, and laboratory variables were selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression. Ten ML algorithms were trained and compared: logistic regression, support vector machine, neural network, k-nearest neighbors, decision tree, random forest (RF), gradient boosting machine, light gradient boosting machine, extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and naïve Bayes. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), precision-recall curves, calibration curves, decision curve analysis, and confusion matrices. Shapley additive explanations values were used for interpretation, and final models were implemented in a Shiny web application. Results: Overall, 361 of 553 patients (65.3%) achieved 1-week functional recovery, and 60 patients (10.8%) experienced 90-day readmission. For 1-week functional recovery, XGBoost achieved test-set AUC 0.856, accuracy 77.0%, sensitivity 76.9%, and specificity 77.2%. Key predictors were Barthel Index, New York Heart Association class, creatinine, serum chloride, and serum sodium. For 90-day readmission, RF achieved test-set AUC 0.662, accuracy 90.9%, sensitivity 22.2%, and specificity 99.3%, with creatinine, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and creatinine clearance as top predictors. Conclusion: ML models showed promise for predicting short-term functional recovery in patients with CVD, while prediction of 90-day readmission remained challenging. The Shiny-based dual-outcome tool may serve as a research prototype to support individualized risk estimation, model interpretation, and multidisciplinary post-discharge management, but external validation and prospective evaluation are required before clinical application.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasefunctional recoverymachine learningmultidisciplinary healthcarereadmissionSHapley Additive exPlanations

Identifiers

PMID42519302
PMCPMC13381329

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.