ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Nursing Intervention to Support Psychological Recovery Among Intensive Care Patients and Their Families: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Psychological distress is highly prevalent among intensive care unit (ICU) patients and their families, often persisting long after discharge and contributing to post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). Although nursing interventions play a critical role in addressing these challenges, existing evidence remains fragmented across different intervention approaches. Objective: This systematic review aimed to identify, categorize, and evaluate the effectiveness of nursing interventions in supporting psychological recovery among ICU patients and their families. Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Five electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EBSCOhost, SpringerLink, and Taylor & Francis, were searched on 5 March 2026. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion, as this design provides the highest level of evidence for evaluating intervention effectiveness and minimizes confounding bias. Eligible studies involved adult ICU patients and/or their family members receiving nursing-led or nursing-involved interventions targeting psychological outcomes. Data were synthesized narratively due to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity across interventions, populations, and outcome measures. Results: A total of 18 RCTs were included. Interventions were categorized into four domains: psychosocial, rehabilitation and follow-up, technology-based, and family-based interventions. Psychosocial interventions demonstrated effectiveness in reducing anxiety, although results for depression and PTSD were inconsistent. Rehabilitation and follow-up interventions improved physical and functional outcomes but showed limited effects on psychological recovery. Technology-based interventions, particularly virtual reality, showed promising but variable results depending on their integration with therapeutic support. Family-based interventions appeared promising in improving psychological outcomes across patients and caregivers, though this finding is based on a limited number of studies and warrants further investigation. A significant gap was identified in the pre-ICU phase, with very limited evidence on preventive interventions. Conclusion: Nursing interventions have the potential to support psychological recovery in ICU populations, particularly when delivered as multicomponent, family-centered, and continuous care. However, current evidence remains limited by methodological heterogeneity, risk of bias, inconsistent outcomes, and the predominance of studies from high-income settings, which limits generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.