Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519268›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Mapping COVID-19 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research in Medical Imaging: A Bibliometric Analysis of Datasets, Trends, and Clinical Challenges.

Patrice Menoudji Djetoyom, Alladoumbaye Ngueilbaye, Adam Abakar Hamid, Atitso Akofala

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Patrice Menoudji DjetoyomCollege of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, CHN.
Alladoumbaye NgueilbayeSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, CHN.
Adam Abakar HamidCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou, CHN.
Atitso AkofalaCollege of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin, CHN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for COVID-19 pandemic diagnosis has exposed critical gaps in medical imaging datasets. This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant bibliometric review of 450 PubMed studies (2020-2024) reveals that only 21.5% of the datasets remain clinically validated, while 55% are unavailable or repurposed from non-COVID-19 sources. We identified persistent issues, such as resolution heterogeneity and radiologist annotation scarcity, that undermine model reliability. Numerous convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures have been developed to enable fast and accurate automated diagnosis of COVID-19 using computed tomography (CT) or X-ray imaging. However, due to the urgency of the pandemic and the rapid demand for solutions, existing computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) systems face several critical limitations, such as imbalanced datasets, insufficient bias assessment in model training, and inconsistent quality control in image acquisition and preprocessing. In this bibliometric analysis, we provide an analysis of PubMed articles on COVID-19 imaging published between January 1, 2020, and November 1, 2024. The research included 1261 publications. VOSviewer was used to generate a visual map of the keyword networks and authors. The journal with the most publications was Elsevier, and the most used dataset was the COVID-19 Radiography Database from Kaggle.

Indexed as

bibliometric analysiscomputed tomographyconvolutional neural networkcovid-19vosviewerx-ray

Identifiers

PMID42519268
PMCPMC13384334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.