ReviewCureus2026
Mapping COVID-19 Artificial Intelligence (AI) Research in Medical Imaging: A Bibliometric Analysis of Datasets, Trends, and Clinical Challenges.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) for COVID-19 pandemic diagnosis has exposed critical gaps in medical imaging datasets. This Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant bibliometric review of 450 PubMed studies (2020-2024) reveals that only 21.5% of the datasets remain clinically validated, while 55% are unavailable or repurposed from non-COVID-19 sources. We identified persistent issues, such as resolution heterogeneity and radiologist annotation scarcity, that undermine model reliability. Numerous convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures have been developed to enable fast and accurate automated diagnosis of COVID-19 using computed tomography (CT) or X-ray imaging. However, due to the urgency of the pandemic and the rapid demand for solutions, existing computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) systems face several critical limitations, such as imbalanced datasets, insufficient bias assessment in model training, and inconsistent quality control in image acquisition and preprocessing. In this bibliometric analysis, we provide an analysis of PubMed articles on COVID-19 imaging published between January 1, 2020, and November 1, 2024. The research included 1261 publications. VOSviewer was used to generate a visual map of the keyword networks and authors. The journal with the most publications was Elsevier, and the most used dataset was the COVID-19 Radiography Database from Kaggle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.