Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519221›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2026

Lung cancer in interstitial lung disease: a matched case-control and cohort analysis.

Megan Harrison, Vidya Navaratnam, Francesca Gonnelli, Caitlin Fermoyle, David Price, Richard Hubbard, Tamera J Corte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Megan HarrisonFaculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-1270
Vidya NavaratnamDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2914-8012
Francesca GonnelliFaculty of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Caitlin FermoyleFaculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
David PriceObservational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9728-9992
Richard HubbardFaculty of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tamera J CorteFaculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer is significantly more common in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) than the general population. Whether this risk extends to other fibrotic interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) including hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and connective-tissue disease ILD (CTD-ILD), remains uncertain. We aimed to characterise lung cancer prevalence and incidence across ILDs. Methods: We conducted matched case-control and cohort analyses using the Optimum Patient Care Research Database. Adults with incident ILD were matched up to 1:4 to controls by age, sex and practice. Pre-existing lung cancer was examined using conditional logistic regression. Lung cancer incidence rates were analysed using Fine-Gray competing-risk models. Analyses were conducted overall and by ILD subtype. Findings: We evaluated 15 777 people with ILD (10 030 IPF, 4347 CTD-ILD, 1400 HP) and 62 417 controls. Prevalence of lung cancer at index date was 1.3% in ILD Interpretation: A strong relationship between ILD and lung cancer exists, with increased risk in CTD-ILD and IPF compared to the general population. Findings of this study support consideration of targeted lung cancer surveillance within ILD management paradigms.

Identifiers

PMID42519221
PMCPMC13383092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.