ArticleERJ open research2026
Effect of fan-to-face therapy on exertional breathlessness in adults with chronic lung disease.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Exertional breathlessness is a common and disabling symptom for people with COPD and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Fan-to-face (F2F) therapy, which may stimulate trigeminal nerve afferents Methods: In a randomised crossover trial, 32 participants (COPD: n=27; ILD: n=5) completed three 4-min CWR-TTs with F2F, F2L or NF. Breathlessness intensity (primary outcome) and physiological variables were recorded throughout. Results: F2F reduced breathlessness intensity by 0.5 units on the Borg 0-10 scale, compared with NF, but did not reduce breathlessness intensity compared with F2L. F2F resulted in a lower facial skin temperature, but no differences were observed in ventilation, breathing pattern, heart rate or blood oxygen saturation. In an exploratory subgroup analysis of 20 participants with breathlessness intensity of ≥3 Borg units under NF, F2F decreased breathlessness intensity by 0.9 units during the 4-min CWR-TT, compared with NF, but not compared with F2L. Clinically meaningful reductions in exertional breathlessness intensity (≥1 Borg unit) were reported by 31% of the full sample and 45% of the exploratory subgroup under F2F Conclusion: Whether due to stimulation of trigeminal nerve afferents or placebo effects, F2F therapy should reasonably be considered as a potentially effective nonpharmacological intervention for exertional breathlessness, especially among adults with chronic lung disease who report more severe breathlessness on exertion.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.