ArticleBrain & spine2026
Distal nerve transfers for median nerve reinnervation and hand function restoration.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Proximal and extensive median nerve median nerve injuries cause profound disability, impairing daily activities and quality of life. Outcomes after autologous nerve grafting are often suboptimal, due to long regeneration distances and complex branching. Distal nerve transfers offer a more direct reconstructive approach. Research question: May combined distal nerve transfers (ECRB-AIN, SUP-FDS, ADM-TE, and DDN-PDN) restore hand function and quality of life in patients with proximal or extensive median nerve injuries? Material and methods: A retrospective series of 13 patients (9 males, 4 females; mean age 35 years (17-62)) who underwent distal nerve transfer procedure(s) between 2011 and 2022 for proximal or extensive median nerve injury. All patients were followed for at least 2 years with standardized pre- and postoperative assessment of motor function, grasp and pinch strength, thumb opposition (Kapandji score), and quality of life (PNSQoL). Results: All patients initially presented with absent finger flexion (M0), of which: 11 achieved M4 recovery, while one reached M2 and M1. Grasp strength improved from 22.8% (0-45%) to 62.8% (13-87%), pinch strength from 27.5% (0-43%) to 62.0% (20-90%), Kapandji score from 4.2 (1-6) to 7.5 (2-10), and PNSQoL from 41.3 (30-47) to 67.4 (45-79). All improvements were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Discussion and conclusion: Distal nerve transfers provided consistent functional recovery, supporting their role as a primary reconstructive strategy in proximal median nerve injuries. Combined motor and sensory transfers yielded meaningful improvements in grasp, pinch, thumb opposition, and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.