ReviewBrain & spine2026
Subcortical brain mapping strategies for intraoperative identification of the optic radiation during asleep and awake surgery: a scoping review.
Review in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Postoperative visual deficits after glioma surgery may significantly reduce quality of life. Multiple techniques for intraoperative mapping of the optic radiation (OR) have been described, but no consensus exists regarding optimal strategies, particularly for novel neurophysiological recording techniques. Research question: We conducted a scoping review to systematically organize the existing paradigms for intraoperative OR mapping, distinguishing awake task-based approaches from evoked potential recording techniques, and to outline future directions for standardization. Material and methods: This scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies describing intraoperative mapping of the OR in any surgical setting were included. Stimulation and recording parameters, as well as intraoperative task paradigms, were extracted and synthesized. Results: Nineteen studies involving 212 patients were included: four reporting neurophysiological recording techniques, 14 describing awake mapping approaches, and one combining both. Three main technique categories were identified: subcortico-cortical evoked potentials (SCEP), subcortical recorded visual evoked potentials (sVEP), and awake task-based mapping. Discussion and conclusion: A modified picture-naming task during awake mapping, presenting two figures diagonally on a screen, has proven useful in estimating the OR boundary, allowing maximal safe resection while limiting postoperative deficits to an acceptable quadrantanopia in most low-grade glioma surgeries. Alternative awake paradigms show promise but require further validation. Intraoperative neurophysiological recording techniques are technically feasible, and their role could be relevant in the future, particularly for patients unsuitable for awake surgery. However, methodological standardization and clinical validation are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.