ArticleInternational journal of school health2025
Assessment of the Concurrent Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Pediatric Balance Scale in Schoolchildren with Down Syndrome.
Article in International journal of school health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Individuals with Down Syndrome face numerous challenges related to movement and balance. The present study evaluated the reliability and concurrent validity of the Persian version of the Pediatric Balance Scale in schoolchildren. Methods: In this cross-sectional correlational study, 37 students (23 girls and 14 boys) with Down Syndrome aged 7 to 15 were recruited through convenience sampling technique. The participants were selected from special education schools in the spring of 2024. Initially, the procedure for performing the tests was taught to the children. Then, at a two-week interval (one session per week for a child), the tests were administered by two independent examiners. The Timed Up and Go, Pediatric Balance Scale, and Standing Stork Test were used to assess balance. The statistical tests used in this study were the intra-class correlation coefficient and Pearson's correlation coefficient, at a 95% confidence level. Results: Pearson's correlation test revealed a substantial correlation between Pediatric Balance Scale and Standing Stork Test (r=0.585, P<0.001), and an inverse correlation between Pediatric Balance Scale and the Timed Up and Go test (r=-0.606, P<0.001). These correlation coefficients indicated a moderate to strong relationship between these tests and Pediatric Balance Scale. Based on the intra-class correlation coefficients obtained, the within-evaluator (ICC=1.000) and between-evaluator (ICC=0.973) agreements were high and reliable. Conclusions: Pediatric Balance Scale appears to have excellent reliability and appropriate concurrent validity for assessing balance in schoolchildren with Down Syndrome. Therefore, it is recommended that this balance scale be used to evaluate balance in these individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.