ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2026
Systematic gravity-induced posterior tumour drift in free-breathing lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy.
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and purpose: Intra-fractional respiratory tumour motion is a known challenge in lung stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), as it can compromise target dose coverage. Gravity-induced tumour baseline drift during free-breathing carries the same risk but remains uncharacterised. This study aimed to quantify posterior tumour drift in peripheral lung SABR, investigate predictive factors, and evaluate tumour dose coverage. Materials and methods: In total, 97 patients (102 tumours) treated with 67.5 Gy in 3 fractions were analysed. Pre- and post-treatment cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging quantified intra-fractional shifts at the first and second fraction. Temporal linear regression determined patient-specific drift rates. Correlations between drift rates and patient and tumour parameters were assessed. Plans were recalculated for worst-case drifts exceeding the 4 mm posterior planning target volume (PTV) margin. Results: Systematic posterior drift was observed, with mean vertical shifts of -1.45 mm at the first fraction and - 1.24 mm at the second fraction (both Conclusions: Gravity-induced posterior drift represents a systematic, clinically significant phenomenon in free-breathing lung SABR. In 15.7% of patients, drifts exceeded planning margins, with potentially severe target underdosage. Routine post-treatment CBCT verification is recommended to identify at-risk patients, enabling intervention at subsequent fractions to ensure treatment accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.