Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42519134›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026

Digital Technologies for Community Consultation and Public Disclosure in Exception From Informed Consent Trials.

Henry E Wang, Manish I Shah, Shannon W Stephens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Henry E WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ohio State University, Ohio, USA.
Manish I ShahDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Shannon W StephensDivision of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

Funding

1/2 – Pediatric Prehospital Airway Resuscitation TrialUG3HL165019 · NHLBI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, HENRY E. · 2023 to 2023
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS UG3 HL165019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community Consultation and Public Disclosure (CC/PD) are essential ethical requirements for clinical trials conducted under Exception from Informed Consent (EFIC). Traditional CC/PD approaches, such as advertisements, manual surveys, and inperson meetings, are often resource-intensive and limited in scale, geographic reach, and community representativeness. Digital technologies, such as social media campaigns, digital survey panels, and virtual video conferencing, offer new modalities to disseminate information, solicit feedback, and facilitate bidirectional dialogue with community populations. Digital CC/PD strategies can expand measurable reach, shorten implementation timelines, and provide quantifiable indices of engagement while maintaining acceptability among Institutional Review Boards. When deployed alongside local engagement activities, digital technologies offer additional tools that may strengthen the practical conduct of CC/PD. This review summarizes contemporary digital approaches to CC/PD and highlights their impact on modern emergency care research.

Indexed as

community engagementexception from informed consentinformed consentsocial media

Identifiers

PMID42519134
PMCPMC13382235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.