ArticleiScience2026
Glutinous rice paste stabilizes earthen site soil with environmental benefits.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Earthen sites deteriorate under long-term environmental exposure, requiring compatible and low-carbon stabilization strategies. This study evaluated glutinous rice paste (GRP) as a stabilizer for authentic soil from the Tongwan city site. Samples were treated with 0, 5.0, 7.5, and 10.0 wt% GRP and examined using direct shear, consolidation, SEM, X-ray CT, and life cycle assessment. The optimal consistency was 7.5 wt%, which increased cohesion by 70.3% and reduced compressibility by 27.5%; 5.0 wt% produced limited strengthening, whereas 10.0 wt% increased compressibility. SEM and CT analyses showed that GRP formed a gelatinized polysaccharide network that coated and bonded soil particles, refined pores, and reduced pore connectivity and orientation. Compared with potassium silicate and lime-polypropylene fiber stabilization, GRP reduced global warming potential by 57% and 90%, respectively. Overall, GRP provides a mechanically effective and environmentally friendly option for the low-carbon conservation of earthen site soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.