ArticleiScience2026
Interpretable machine learning reveals daytime and nighttime forest fire point drivers in Guizhou.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Daytime and nighttime forest fire risk reflects contrasting atmospheric, fuel, and human activity conditions, with implications for time specific fire management. We analyzed moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) active fire points in Guizhou Province from 2009 to 2024 and integrated meteorological, topographic, vegetation, anthropogenic, and socioeconomic variables to model all, daytime, and nighttime fire points occurrence. Random Forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), and ensemble models were compared, and SHAP analysis was used to interpret driver contributions and generate relative fire risk grade zoning maps. Fire points showed strong spring concentration and clustering in southern and southwestern Guizhou. Daytime high-risk areas were broader and more continuous, whereas nighttime high-risk areas were concentrated in fewer core zones. Humidity, temperature, rainfall, wind, and normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) were shared drivers, while human related factors differed between daytime and nighttime models. This study provides evidence for time-specific forest fire monitoring, risk assessment, and prevention in mountainous regions by revealing daytime and nighttime differences in fire points and their drivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.