Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518984›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2026

An adapted process to develop customized assessments to measure the impact of biology lessons.

A E Foltz, S Z Hoagland, A N Olson, B N MacNeill, M R Stetzer, M K Smith, B A Couch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

A E FoltzDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7760-8136
S Z HoaglandSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4949-2559
A N OlsonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3310-2380
B N MacNeillDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5809-046X
M R StetzerDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8081-831X
M K SmithDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7721-7417
B A CouchSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6972-6561

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When instructors, curriculum developers, or education researchers implement an innovative lesson or develop a shareable lesson plan, they likely want to know if the lesson is effective at facilitating student learning. Published assessments, which have undergone a substantial development and optimization process, are commonly used to evaluate the impact of curricular and pedagogical innovations. However, there are some cases when using an existing concept assessment does not align with the goals of the person administering the assessment. Concept assessments usually cover a broad content domain spanning entire units, courses, or majors. If an instructor, curriculum developer, or researcher intends to assess learning associated with a discrete time period (e.g., a lesson), a concept assessment may be too broad and thus lack alignment validity. Consequently, they may decide to develop their own assessment. They can accomplish this by writing original questions, using question banks, using questions provided in open educational resources, or a combination of these approaches. Alternatively, they may pursue a time- and resource-intensive comprehensive assessment development process, typically involving several steps to accrue validity evidence. There are currently no guidelines for scaling the process for contexts in which existing concept assessments are misaligned and a comprehensive assessment development process is impractical. Here, we describe an adapted assessment development process to generate lesson-customized assessments. We started with five published biology lessons, covering a broad range of biology topics, and created a lesson-customized assessment for each. Our assessment development process consisted of identifying lesson learning objectives, drafting an initial assessment, soliciting expert feedback and student interviews, and conducting several cycles of review and revision. We provide suggestions to help with practicality and make the process more accessible. Though we developed customized assessments for published biology lessons, our approach is broadly applicable to other cases where customized assessments may be beneficial.

Identifiers

PMID42518984
PMCPMC13383078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.