SynthesisFrontiers in health services2026
Beyond the hospital gown: a systematic review of the common characteristics and design challenges of patient clothing across healthcare departments.
Synthesis in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Patient clothing is an essential component of healthcare delivery, influencing clinical practice, patient comfort, dignity, and overall healthcare experience. Despite extensive research on specialized hospital garments, there remains limited understanding of the common design characteristics shared across different hospital departments. This systematic review aimed to identify and synthesize the general and common characteristics of patient clothing across all hospital settings. Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Comprehensive searches were performed across major academic databases using predefined search terms. Studies were screened according to established inclusion and exclusion criteria, and methodological quality was assessed before inclusion. Forty eligible studies were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Results: The review identified four dominant characteristics consistently shaping patient clothing across healthcare settings: clinical accessibility, standardization, infection control, and cost-efficiency. Garments commonly featured loose silhouettes, simplified construction, and open-back or multi-access designs to facilitate clinical examination and treatment. Standardized, one-size-fits-all designs supported efficient distribution, laundering, and reuse across hospital departments. However, these characteristics were consistently associated with poor fit, restricted mobility, inadequate thermal comfort, insufficient body coverage, and limited adaptability to individual patient needs. The evidence further demonstrated that patient clothing frequently overlooks psychological and expressive dimensions, with uniform designs and exposure-related issues contributing to diminished dignity, loss of personal identity, and increased vulnerability. Discussion: The findings indicate that the defining characteristics of patient clothing are remarkably consistent across hospital departments, reflecting systemic design priorities rather than department-specific requirements. While current designs effectively support clinical efficiency and infection control, they often fail to address patient-centered outcomes. Future patient clothing design should adopt a multidimensional approach that balances functional and clinical requirements with comfort, dignity, personalization, and psychological well-being to enhance the overall healthcare experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.