ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Pain perception and attitudes toward life-sustaining treatment in pediatric patients with disorders of consciousness: a survey of Chinese healthcare professionals.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Managing pain and life-sustaining treatment (LST) for pediatric patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) presents unique neuroethical dilemmas. This study investigated the attitudes of Chinese healthcare professionals (HCPs) toward pain perception and LST in pediatric DoC, specifically exploring the influence of decision-making perspectives and socioeconomic factors. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 656 Chinese HCPs (March-November 2025). Participants evaluated LST limitation and pain perception for unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) and minimally conscious state (MCS) from third-person (for a patient) and first-person (for their own child) perspectives. Multivariate logistic regression identified predictors. Results: HCPs were more supportive of limiting LST for UWS (52.1%) than MCS (31.6%) in third-person contexts ( Conclusion: Chinese HCPs are cautious about limiting LST in pediatric DoC, with attitudes shaped by diagnosis, kinship perspective, and economic context. Widespread recognition of pain perception in non-communicative children underscores a critical ethical boundary. A culturally sensitive, evidence-based decision-support framework integrating neuroplasticity, socioeconomic reality, and pain ethics is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.