ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Utilizing conditional generative adversarial network to generate head MRA based on nonvascular sequences: comparative study of single-modality and multi-modality methods.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a deep learning model synthesizing head MRA images from the preferred nonvascular sequences (T1W, T2W, and FLAIR) and evaluate the diagnostic performance of synthetic MRA (syn-MRA). Methods: This retrospective study included geriatric inpatients who underwent multimodal MRI (including MRA and nonvascular sequences) at our institution between January 2022 and March 2023. Three single-modality conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN) models (T1W, T2W, and FLAIR-based) and one multi-modality model (MIX model) were constructed. Quantitative metrics were used to evaluate image quality. Two radiologists independently assessed image visual quality using Likert scales. Two senior neuroradiologists evaluated structured reports and diagnostic confidence. Results: This study ultimately included 140 patients: 98 training, 14 validation, 28 testing. The MIX model outperformed single-modality models (test set: structural similarity index measure 0.880, peak signal-to-noise ratio 33.18 dB, root mean squared error 0.022). Syn-MRA from all models demonstrated significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio compared to real MRA ( Conclusion: The MIX model outperformed single-modality models, with image quality and diagnostic performance comparable to real MRA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.