Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518928›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of school health2026

School Health Intervention: Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) in Schools (WinS) Program in Public Schools of the National Capital Region, Philippines.

Dominic Hermano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of school health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dominic HermanoCollege of Nursing, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The program of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) in Schools (WinS), implemented by the Department of Education, supports the United Nations (UN) Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Goal 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and Goal 3 (Good Health and Well-being). The present study assessed the extent of implementation of WinS in public schools in the National Capital Region (NCR), Philippines, identified the most challenging program elements, and explored the associations with demographic characteristics of implementers. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional survey was conducted from March to May 2023 among 706 School WinS Coordinators (SWCs) across public elementary and secondary schools in National Capital Region (NCR). Data were collected using a modified Department of Education WinS monitoring tool. Descriptive statistics and nonparametric tests (e.g., Chi-square) were used in SPSS version 26. Results: The WinS program was rated as "implemented" (mean value=3.41), with Sanitation as the only "fully implemented" element (mean value=3.60). Deworming was the most difficult element and Funding Stability was the most complex domain. Significant differences were found based on implementer demographics. Age was associated with implementation ratings for Water, Sanitation, Hygiene, and Health Education (all P≤0.001). Position was linked to Water (P=0.031), Sanitation (P=0.036), Hygiene (P=0.048), and Deworming (P=0.008). Subject taught and grade level were also significantly related to some elements. Gender, educational attainment, and length of experience showed no significant associations. Conclusions: While WinS implementation in NCR schools is generally positive, gaps remain in Deworming and Funding Stability. Tailoring support based on implementer demographics may improve program delivery.

Indexed as

HygienePhilippinesSanitationSchool Health ServicesWater

Identifiers

PMID42518928
PMCPMC13379623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.