Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518913›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2026

Effect of Oliceridine on the Acute Postoperative Pain Management After Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.

Jing Jiang, Guanghua Yuan, Yuhui Shi, Zhou Zhou, Xinxin Wang, Xiaoqiao Sang, Xiaobao Zhang

Abstract readEquivalence TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jing Jiang *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Guanghua Yuan *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Yuhui Shi *Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Zhou ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xinxin WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqiao SangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0006-9502-5594
Xiaobao ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Lianyungang Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Lianyungang, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0003-4013-1075

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Effective postoperative analgesia following cesarean delivery is crucial for maternal recovery. Sufentanil, commonly administered via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA), is associated with dose-dependent adverse effects, particularly gastrointestinal disturbances. Oliceridine, a novel G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist, offers the dual advantage of potent analgesia and a reduced risk of opioid-related adverse events. This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy and the incidence of side effects between the G protein-biased μ-opioid receptor agonist oliceridine and the conventional opioid sufentanil. Patients and Methods: In this single-center, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, women undergoing elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA) were randomly assigned to receive either oliceridine or sufentanil via patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for 48 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was the sum of pain intensity differences over 48 hours (SPID Results: 160 participants were included in the final analysis. The primary outcome, SPID Conclusion: Oliceridine provides non-inferior postoperative analgesic efficacy compared with sufentanil in women undergoing cesarean delivery. Exploratory observations suggested a lower incidence of nausea and higher patient satisfaction in the oliceridine group; these findings are hypothesis-generating and require further validation.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidCesarean SectionPostoperative PainAdultAnalgesia, Patient-ControlledDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansPain ManagementPregnancySpiro CompoundsSufentanilThiophenes((3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl)((2-(9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro(4.5)decan-9-yl)ethyl))amineAnalgesics, OpioidSpiro CompoundsSufentanilThiopheneslactationoliceridinepatient-controlled intravenous analgesiapostoperative analgesiasufentanil

Identifiers

PMID42518913
PMCPMC13381345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.