ReviewFrontiers in surgery2026
Adult degenerative scoliosis: challenges in diagnosis, pain management, and surgical decision-making.
Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Adult Degenerative Scoliosis (ADS) is an age-related, progressive, three-dimensional spinal deformity driven by asymmetric degeneration of the intervertebral discs, facet joints, and supporting soft tissues. With population aging, ADS is increasingly recognized as a major contributor to pain, disability, loss of independence, and healthcare utilization. Objective: This narrative review synthesizes evidence around three core challenges in the clinical management of ADS: (1) diagnostic difficulty due to heterogeneous etiology and symptom overlap with other degenerative conditions, (2) multidimensional chronic pain requiring multimodal, longitudinal strategies, and (3) high-stakes surgical decision-making that must balance deformity correction against complication risk and patient expectations. Methods and key content: We integrate contemporary concepts from adult spinal deformity classification and alignment targets, clinical and imaging assessment, and both nonoperative and operative treatment pathways. Particular emphasis is placed on standing full-spine radiographs and spinopelvic parameters, the mixed mechanical and neurogenic pain phenotypes that typify ADS, and stratified surgical strategies ranging from decompression alone to long-segment fusion with osteotomy. We also summarize major complications (e.g., proximal junctional kyphosis, pseudarthrosis, implant failure, infection) and their implications for counseling and risk mitigation. Conclusion: ADS care benefits from a patient-centered, individualized, and multidisciplinary strategy. Future work should prioritize accurate prognostic models, minimally invasive and alignment-restoring techniques with lower morbidity, and durable approaches for long-term pain control and function preservation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.