Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518824›Full record

ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026

Remote monitoring to improve engagement for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized clinical trial.

Shivan J Mehta, Phuoc Nguyen, Caitlin Brophy, Catherine Reitz, Christopher K Snider, Meenakshi Bewtra, James D Lewis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04388865 (Clinical Hovering to Improve Patient Engagement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04388865 nacompletednot on this map

Clinical Hovering to Improve Patient Engagement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PennsylvaniaRan2021 to 2023Enrolled150ConditionsInflammatory Bowel Diseases, Crohn Disease, Ulcerative ColitisArmsControl, Text-based Clinical Hovering
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shivan J MehtaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6066-4739
Phuoc NguyenDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Caitlin BrophyDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Catherine ReitzDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Christopher K SniderPopulation Health Lab, Center for Health Care Transformation & Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Meenakshi BewtraDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
James D LewisDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

Phenotypic Diversity in COVID-19UL1TR001878 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI FITZGERALD, GARRET A · 2016 to 2025
$102.4M
Undergraduate Clinical Scholars Program: Pathway to Clinical Research CareersR25DK108711 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI James D Lewis · 2017 to 2026
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001878NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK108711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Biologic therapy has improved care for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but adherence is often suboptimal, and a gap in care is lack of engagement between visits. We evaluated the effect of a behaviorally-informed remote text monitoring program on outcomes and adherence among patients with IBD. Methods: Adults with IBD and receiving biologics through home health or self-injection were individually randomized 1:1 to control (usual care) or intervention (remote monitoring), stratified by medication type (home infusion vs. injection). The 4-month intervention included the following components via text message: (1) biologic dose reminders, (2) medication adherence check-ins after each dose, (3) weekly symptom check-ins with escalation to the patient's care team if above threshold, and (4) feedback to an identified support partner (when applicable). The primary outcome was change in quality of life via the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ). Results: 150 patients were enrolled; 148 completed the study, and 144 were analyzed for the survey outcomes (73 control, 71 intervention). The mean age was 38.9, 52.7% were female, and 81.1% were White. No significant differences were found between arms for the change in median score from baseline to end of study for the SIBDQ, MARS-5, or patient satisfaction surveys. Medication adherence remained high across both arms, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of days covered for infusion or injection between arms. Conclusions: Remote monitoring was feasible with high patient satisfaction, but there was no improvement in quality of life or medication adherence. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04388865.

Indexed as

behavioral scienceinflammatory bowel diseaseremote monitoringtext messaging

Identifiers

PMID42518824
PMCPMC13384052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.