ArticleCrohn's & colitis 3602026
Remote monitoring to improve engagement for patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a randomized clinical trial.
Article in Crohn's & colitis 360, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04388865 (Clinical Hovering to Improve Patient Engagement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Clinical Hovering to Improve Patient Engagement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Biologic therapy has improved care for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but adherence is often suboptimal, and a gap in care is lack of engagement between visits. We evaluated the effect of a behaviorally-informed remote text monitoring program on outcomes and adherence among patients with IBD. Methods: Adults with IBD and receiving biologics through home health or self-injection were individually randomized 1:1 to control (usual care) or intervention (remote monitoring), stratified by medication type (home infusion vs. injection). The 4-month intervention included the following components via text message: (1) biologic dose reminders, (2) medication adherence check-ins after each dose, (3) weekly symptom check-ins with escalation to the patient's care team if above threshold, and (4) feedback to an identified support partner (when applicable). The primary outcome was change in quality of life via the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ). Results: 150 patients were enrolled; 148 completed the study, and 144 were analyzed for the survey outcomes (73 control, 71 intervention). The mean age was 38.9, 52.7% were female, and 81.1% were White. No significant differences were found between arms for the change in median score from baseline to end of study for the SIBDQ, MARS-5, or patient satisfaction surveys. Medication adherence remained high across both arms, and there was no significant difference in the proportion of days covered for infusion or injection between arms. Conclusions: Remote monitoring was feasible with high patient satisfaction, but there was no improvement in quality of life or medication adherence. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04388865.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.