ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Optimizing ciltacabtagene autoleucel outcomes: real-world experience and best practices from a single academic center.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), a B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, has transformed the management of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma and demonstrated long-term, treatment-free remissions in patients (CARTITUDE-1: median overall survival, 60.7 months and 33% of patients with progression-free survival ≥5 years). While pivotal clinical trials have demonstrated unprecedented depth and durability of response, the real-world populations can sometimes diverge from trial-eligible cohorts, with greater age variability, comorbidity burden, functional limitations, and logistic challenges that may impact outcomes. As cilta-cel adoption expands across treatment centers into the community and outpatient settings, generating real-world evidence and best practices is critical to ensuring that the transformative potential of this therapy is realized safely and effectively. This is a single-center report on our experience implementing cilta-cel. We share practical strategies that have supported favorable safety and clinical outcomes across the treatment continuum-beginning with patient selection, baseline risk assessment and pre-infusion optimization, through acute monitoring and management of adverse events, to longer-term follow-up. We highlight the importance of structured workflows, multidisciplinary coordination, early referral pathways, anticipatory guidance, and collaborative care models in achieving safe and effective outcomes. As centers continue to refine cilta-cel implementation, these institutional insights will play a key role in shaping best practices for patients receiving CAR-T therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.