ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026
Improving CT-CBCT deformable image registration for cervical cancer adaptive radiotherapy using a deep learning approach.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To improve the robustness and anatomical alignment accuracy of CT-CBCT deformable image registration for cervical cancer adaptive radiotherapy. Methods: A deep learning-based registration framework was developed by enhancing a transformer-based model (UTSRMorph) with a normalized gradient field (NGF) constraint. The network integrates convolutional and transformer modules to capture multi-scale anatomical features. A composite loss function combining mutual information, deformation regularization, and gradient-based similarity was used for training. The method was evaluated on internal and external CBCT-CT datasets using Dice, HD95, and Jacobian determinant. Results: On the internal dataset, the proposed method achieved Dice scores comparable to the baseline across all structures (bowel: 82.84%), while improving deformation regularity, with low non-positive Jacobian determinant values (%|J|≤0: 0.13), comparable to UTSRMorph (0.12) and lower than VoxelMorph (0.19) and TransMorph (0.21). Slight improvements in Dice and HD95 were observed in bony structures, particularly the hip bones. On the external dataset, the method demonstrated improved generalization, achieving higher Dice for the bowel (83.40% vs. 82.99% and 82.90%) and reduced HD95 (11.70 mm vs. 11.91 mm and 11.85 mm). Improvements were more evident in boundary alignment, especially in high-contrast regions, while maintaining comparable deformation smoothness. Conclusion: The proposed method (NGF-UTSRMorph) improves the robustness of CT-CBCT registration and enhances boundary alignment without compromising deformation smoothness. Improvements were more evident on the cross-scanner test cohort and in boundary-sensitive metrics, suggesting improved robustness under intensity inconsistencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.