ArticleBiofilm2026
From annotation to analysis: a deep-learning pipeline for optical coherence tomography (OCT)-based measurements of biofilm morphology.
Article in Biofilm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofilms represent the predominant mode of bacterial life at solid-liquid interfaces, and understanding their composition, structure, and dynamics is critical to addressing key challenges across medical, environmental, and engineering applications. This study presents a deep learning-based framework for rapid morphological characterisation of biofilms using optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and an automated image processing pipeline. Images were used to train two state-of-the-art segmentation models: YOLOv8 and SegFormer. Both models delivered impressive results in delineating biofilm structures; YOLOv8 achieved 0.99 for accuracy and an intersection over union (IoU) of 0.9, while SegFormer scored 0.97 and 0.87, respectively. Model robustness was assessed across eight challenging biofilm conditions, with YOLOv8 showing superior performance in discriminating thin and non-growing biofilms, and SegFormer's superiority with stable morphologies. Additionally, we developed a framework to extract key morphological characteristics from the segmented images, including thickness, roughness and density distribution. The model-derived measurements showed strong agreement with manually generated ground truth data, confirming the reliability of the automated pipeline. Furthermore, an experiment involving four taxonomically distinct multi-species biofilms demonstrated the utility of the approach for discriminating biofilms based on their morphology. The software, containing both segmentation models, is openly available to the community and provides a foundation for future high-throughput studies examining biofilm responses to taxonomic or environmental variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.