Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518766›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2026

Structured microalgal bioprints for enhanced photosynthetic performance and growth.

Swathi Murthy, Maria Mosshammer, Michael Kühl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Swathi MurthyDepartment of Biology, Marine Biological Section, University of Copenhagen, Helsingør, Denmark.
Maria MosshammerDepartment of Biology, Marine Biological Section, University of Copenhagen, Helsingør, Denmark.
Michael KühlDepartment of Biology, Marine Biological Section, University of Copenhagen, Helsingør, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient cultivation of microalgae for biofuel and bioproduct applications is often limited by suboptimal light distribution, poor mass transfer of chemical species, and large land footprint requirements in conventional flat biofilm and open-pond systems. In this proof-of-concept study, we employ a closed-loop, computation-guided framework that integrates predictive modeling, 3D bioprinting, and quantitative experimentation to design and explore the influence of bioprinted microalgal geometry on photosynthetic production, where experimentally derived parameters are reintegrated into simulations to interpret performance. Specifically, we investigate a perforated slab with channels (PS) and Vgroove structures, which exhibited higher measured algal growth rates, under the present experimental conditions, compared to flat slabs of the same volume and footprint. By integrating experimentally measured photosynthetic parameters into radiative transfer and oxygen diffusion-reaction simulations, we analyze the potential contribution of geometry-induced differences in light penetration, surface area-to-volume ratio, and mass transfer dynamics that are consistent with the observed trends in algal growth and photosynthesis. These findings illustrate the potential of engineered 3D bioprinted architectures to optimize photosynthetic efficiency and growth rates, while minimizing spatial footprint, paving the way for compact, high-throughput bioreactors for sustainable algal cultivation.

Indexed as

bioprintinglight transfermass transfermicroalgaepredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID42518766
PMCPMC13381435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.