ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Translation and psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the revised MISSCARE Survey.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Preliminary Psychometric Evaluation of the Romanian Version of the Revised MISSCARE Survey: A Single-Centre Pilot Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To develop a Japanese version of the revised MISSCARE Survey and evaluate its psychometric properties among nurses in acute care hospitals. Design: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of a psychometric instrument. Methods: Between October and November 2025, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1136 registered nurses working at two acute care hospitals in Tokyo. The construct validity of Part A (missed nursing care) and Part B (reasons for missed care) was examined using exploratory factor analysis, followed by confirmatory factor analysis. Reliability was assessed using McDonald's omega and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Of the 1136 eligible nurses, 455 responded to the web-based survey, and 375 nurses with complete data were included in the analysis. Forty-five participants completed the retest 3 weeks after the initial survey. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a three-factor structure for Part A, comprising (1) fundamental care; (2) clinical monitoring and management; and (3) responsive care (Satorra-Bentler scaled χ²(204) = 515.38, Conclusions: The Japanese version of the revised MISSCARE Survey demonstrated acceptable validity and reliability. This instrument enabled the systematic assessment of missed nursing care in Japanese acute care settings, supported the evaluation of nurse staffing and work environment interventions, and facilitated international comparisons to inform evidence-based nursing policies and practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.