ArticleInternational journal of nursing studies advances2026
Registered nurses' clinical reasoning in home-based care: a retrospective think-aloud design - the DECIDE project.
Article in International journal of nursing studies advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinical reasoning in nursing is described as complex, context-dependent, and difficult to articulate. Despite its recognised importance, it is often examined through narrative accounts or inferred from decision outcomes, offering limited insight into how reasoning is articulated and organised in practice. This has limited our understanding of the structure of reasoning, particularly in complex and dynamic settings, and underscores the need for approaches that make this structure explicit and open to systematic analysis. Aim: To explore and describe how registered nurses retrospectively explain and structure their clinical reasoning in relation to observed care situations in home-based care. Methods: A retrospective think-aloud design was used. Nineteen transcripts from registered nurses were analysed using a rule-based modified clinical protocol analysis, with AI-assisted procedures to identify clinical domains, operator configurations, and cross-case structures. Results: Clinical reasoning was consistently organised around recurring patterns of observation and evaluation, often extended into planning in more complex or risk-oriented situations. Reasoning was characterised by non-linear structures combining diagnostic and procedural orientations. Different clinical domains were associated with distinct reasoning structures, including verification-based processes in procedural care and evaluation-planning processes in autonomy- and support-focused situations. Conclusion: Registered nurses' clinical reasoning in home-based care can be described as structured, multi-layered, and contextually adaptive, rather than strictly linear. The findings suggest that reasoning can be systematically described across cases, making reasoning structures visible and comparable. Implications: This study offers a basis for describing and discussing clinical reasoning more systematically in nursing education, supervision, and future research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.