ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Visual Gains with Faricimab vs Aflibercept 8 mg in Naïve Retinovascular Disease: Global Real-World Cases and Literature Review.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To compare the visual gains of faricimab and aflibercept 8 mg as first-line in real-world management of retinovascular diseases. Methods: Retrospective multicenter interventional case series with retinovascular diseases initiated on faricimab or aflibercept 8 mg till August 30, 2025. Main outcome measure was visual gain in logMAR. Linear mixed-effects model was used to compare vision increase between the two drug groups. In addition, comparative Phase 3 trials were supplemented by a literature review of treatment-naïve eyes using major databases till September 30, 2025. Results: We collected 500 treated eyes from 35 collaborating centers. The treatment groups included 395 eyes receiving faricimab vs 105 receiving aflibercept 8 mg distributed into neovascular macular degeneration (270 vs 58), diabetic macular edema (97 vs 39) and macular edema associated with retinal vein occlusion (28 vs 8). Adjusted visual gains were comparable between the two drugs in various retinal categories (p=0.672). Conclusion: Visual acuity improved significantly and equally in both aflibercept 8 mg and faricimab in several treatment-naïve retinovascular diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.