ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Encircling Laser Prophylaxis for Retinal Detachment in Stickler Syndrome: The Impact on Visual Field.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07146516 (Ora Secunda Cerclage Laser Retinopexy To Prevent Retinal Detachment In Stickler Syndrome), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Ora Secunda Cerclage Laser Retinopexy To Prevent Retinal Detachment In Stickler Syndrome (OSC/SS): A Prospective Historically Controlled Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: It is our purpose to address concerns regarding visual field loss as a barrier to optimal performance of encircling laser retinopexy as a prophylaxis for retinal detachment, especially when extended posteriorly, as in prophylaxis for retinal detachment in Stickler syndrome (SS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed visual field and visual acuity changes after encircling laser prophylaxis extending to the posterior edge of the vortex vein ampullae (ora secunda cerclage/Stickler syndrome, OSC/SS) in our first four SS patients who underwent such prophylaxis. We then used disability tables and validated patient questionnaires to characterize the extent of visual disability and/or symptoms resulting from such encircling prophylaxis. Results: The reduction in peripheral visual field from OSC/SS posterior prophylaxis (to an average diameter of approximately 100 degrees in five treated eyes) was a far smaller percentage impairment (0-21% by various estimations) than the 85% impairment from loss of both visual acuity and visual field after RD in the primary eye of a typical SS patient prior to fellow eye prophylaxis. Turano and NEI VFQ-25 Questionnaires both indicated that everyday mobility and travel visual tasks were not significantly affected by the laser prophylaxis. Conclusion: Encircling laser retinopexy, extending posteriorly to and between the vortex vein ampullae, did not cause significant visual disability or any symptomatic visual field loss in an initial cohort of four patients with SS. Nor did we encounter any symptomatic visual field loss in 22 patients so treated subsequently. OSC/SS encircling laser prophylaxis safety and effectiveness is now being prospectively studied in a larger clinical trial (NCT07146516).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.