ArticleOpen respiratory archives
Serious Game for Long Term Oxygen Therapy Education: Initial Results in Undergraduate Medical Students.
Article in Open respiratory archives. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) is a treatment commonly prescribed for patients with chronic respiratory diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, and pulmonary hypertension, as well as for palliative management. Despite its wide use, both clinicians and patients report insufficient education on LTOT, particularly in non-specialized settings. This study presents the initial results of a developed serious game aimed at teaching core LTOT concepts. The game includes eight interactive clinical scenarios covering indications, initial assessment, device types, daily use, follow-up, equipment maintenance, complications, and special situations. A total of 120 fourth-year medical students participated over two academic years and completed pre- and post-intervention questionnaires. All students completed the game, with high engagement and overall performance. Knowledge significantly improved after the intervention, with a meaningful increase in correct responses. These findings suggest that a serious game may be an effective educational tool for improving LTOT knowledge among preclinical medical students and could be expanded to other health professionals, patients, and caregivers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.