ArticleUrology case reports2026
Post-circumcision penile epidermal inclusion cyst in an 8-year-old: A rare late complication of neonatal surgery.
Article in Urology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post-circumcision penile epidermal inclusion cysts (EICs) are exceptionally rare late complications of neonatal circumcision, arising from iatrogenic implantation of squamous epithelium into subcutaneous tissue. We report an 8-year-old boy presenting with a painless penile shaft mass eight years after uneventful neonatal circumcision. Ultrasonography with color Doppler demonstrated an avascular cystic lesion without urethral or corporal communication. Complete surgical excision confirmed a benign epidermal inclusion cyst on histopathology, with no evidence of malignancy. No recurrence was observed at six-month follow-up. Clinicians should consider EICs when evaluating painless penile masses in circumcised children, regardless of the interval since surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.