ArticleSleep medicine: X2026
Implementation of a digital obstructive sleep apnoea pathway in a tertiary respiratory service: a prospective service evaluation.
Article in Sleep medicine: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is highly prevalent, affecting a substantial proportion of the adult population, but remains frequently underdiagnosed. Traditional face-to-face assessment pathways are slow and resource-intensive, contributing to long waits for diagnosis and treatment. Digitally supported models that combine home testing with virtual review offer a potential solution, yet real-world implementation data from tertiary respiratory services remain limited. Methods: This prospective observational service evaluation examined a digital OSA pathway in a tertiary respiratory service at St. James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. During a 17-month period, adults newly referred for suspected OSA were enrolled in the digital pathway, with the option to opt out in favour of a traditional face-to-face clinic review.Enrolled patients completed app-based questionnaires, underwent WatchPAT home sleep testing, and received virtual sleep physician review via a digital platform. Primary outcomes were pathway activity and completion, diagnostic yield, referral-to-review interval, and 6-month continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence; secondary outcomes included CPAP referral rates and patient satisfaction, and comparison with a retrospective face-to-face clinic cohort. Results: Over 17 months, 23 digital clinics delivered 160 appointments to 118 patients, of whom 104 (88.1%) completed WatchPAT testing. Diagnostic yield was high, with 81/104 tests (77.9%) positive and a mean apnoea hypopnea index (AHI) in the severe range. Mean referral-to-review interval was 5.5 months. Of those with a positive test, 52 (64.2%) commenced CPAP, of whom 29 (55.8%) met standard 6-month adherence criteria.By comparison, 69 patients treated via the standard pathway commenced CPAP and 29 (42.0%) were adherent, corresponding to an odds ratio for adherence of 1.74 (95% confidence interval 0.84-3.60; Conclusions: A digitally integrated OSA pathway combining app-based assessment, home WatchPAT testing and virtual review was feasible to implement in a tertiary respiratory service, with high diagnostic yield and acceptable CPAP adherence in a selected cohort. These findings support further evaluation of digitally enabled OSA pathways as a potential model to expand access and reduce reliance on repeated in-person visits, including rigorous assessment of long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and whether all patient groups benefit equally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.