Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518623›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2026

Food Pantry Usage in a Family Medicine Residency Clinic: A Qualitative Study.

Andre Hirakawa, Steven R Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andre HirakawaPhoenix Department of Family, Community, and Preventive Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.
Steven R BrownPhoenix Department of Family, Community, and Preventive Medicine, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, AZ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Food pantries have been created in health care settings to directly address food insecurity. Little is known about how visitors might use food from a colocated pantry, what items are most useful, how a pantry may improve healthy choices, and the ongoing value of a food pantry in a family medicine office. Methods: We interviewed 55 patients by phone 1 week after their visit to our clinic-based food pantry using a semistructured interview format. We performed a qualitative analysis of open-ended questions using an editing-organizing approach. Results: Most participants cooked or prepared food from the pantry. Food was rarely discarded. A total of 35 of 49 (71%) used 75% or more of the food within 1 week. Fruits and vegetables were among the favorite items of most users. Qualitative themes included strong confidence in ability to cook, making health-conscious choices, taboo against food waste, comfort integrating items into their regular food habits, and the food pantry empowering people to make dietary changes. Conclusions: A food pantry in a residency clinic is feasible, appreciated by visitors, and can help with nutritious food choices for those in need.

Identifiers

PMID42518623
PMCPMC13384455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.