ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2026
Quality of Web-Based Patient Education on Osteoporosis Lifestyle Changes.
Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Osteoporosis is a prevalent condition associated with reduced bone density and increased fracture risk, yet many patients rely on online health information to guide lifestyle management. This study aimed to evaluate the quality and accessibility of consumer health websites providing information on osteoporosis lifestyle modifications. Methods: A systematic Google search identified the first 150 websites, with 85 websites eligible for inclusion. After review of several national guidelines, we established four lifestyle domains: calcium/vitamin D supplementation, fall prevention, exercise, and smoking cessation. Two independent reviewers assessed each website using the DISCERN instrument, which examines the quality of written consumer health information. Results: The mean DISCERN score was 50.7±9.71 (out of 80). Of the 85 websites, 7 (8.2%) were rated as excellent, 41 (48.2%) as good, 31 (36.5%) as fair, 5 (5.9%) as poor, and 1 (1.2%) as very poor. Accessibility features were limited, with 7.8% offering translation and 31.8% incorporating multimedia content. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate considerable variability in quality and highlight gaps in accessibility. Improvements in guideline-based recommendations, transparency, and reliability can support more equitable osteoporosis care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.