Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518618›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2026

Perspectives on Bullying, Social Norms, and Reporting Practices: A National Survey of Department Chairs.

Danielle L Terry, Brandon Gonzalez, Miranda A Moore, Meredith L C Williamson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Danielle L TerryGuthrie Medical Group, Sayre PA.
Brandon GonzalezGeisinger School of Medicine, Scranton, PA.
Miranda A MooreDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Meredith L C WilliamsonNaresh K. Vashist College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan, TX.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Decades of social norms research has highlighted the tendency for individuals to adjust their behaviors based on their reference (or peer) group. Often, inaccuracies in perceptions (eg, self-other difference [SOD]) can increase or decrease one's behavior over time. In medical residency, SODs related to perceptions of others' behaviors predicted the individuals' who reported bullying behavior, a concerning behavior that is common in medicine. The goal of this study was to expand on previous research examining normative perceptions of bullying and negative acts in medicine. Methods: This study used the 2025 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance (CERA) survey of family department chairs. This survey was distributed to 197 family medicine department chairs in addition to other staff within the family medicine education department. Measures included perceived risk of experiencing retaliation and questions measuring perceived norms, which were used to calculate SODs. Results: We assessed differences in perceptions (SODs) using Conclusions: This study expanded on previous research in family medicine and suggested that family medicine department chairs also have inaccurate peer perceptions of attitudes and behaviors related to bullying behavior. Future research might examine the use of social norms interventions as a mechanism to address bullying behavior in family medicine.

Identifiers

PMID42518618
PMCPMC13384453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.