Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518615›Full record

ArticlePRiMER (Leawood, Kan.)2026

Applying Principles of Community-Engaged Research.

Jen Hirsch, Mallet R Reid, Mindy A Smith, Michigan State University Feminist Community Engagement Disrupted Learning Community Writing Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PRiMER (Leawood, Kan.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jen HirschMichigan State University, School of Social Work, East Lansing, MI.
Mallet R ReidDepartment of Family Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Mindy A SmithMichigan State University, Department of Family Medicine, East Lansing, MI.
Michigan State University Feminist Community Engagement Disrupted Learning Community Writing Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Community-engaged research (CEnR) is a participatory approach that foregrounds community priorities and applies research results to community action. CEnR embodies shared decision-making by including community partners' values, preferences, and experiences within the research process. CEnR projects can help medical student learners acquire skills in conducting needs assessments and more fully appreciate the social determinants of health and challenges faced by communities. CEnR does not prescribe specific methods for addressing research questions. Rather, it is a collaborative approach with community members that begins by codetermining the research topic, levels of engagement for all partners, and positionality. CEnR uses participatory methodologies and unique approaches to knowledge cultivation while creating space for dialogue to build relationships and trust. The purpose of this article is to provide a brief introduction to CEnR principles, identify additional resources and tools, and share ways of managing some of the challenges of conducting CEnR.

Identifiers

PMID42518615
PMCPMC13384463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.