Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518565›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2026

The impact of health insurance on rural energy transition: evidence from rural China.

Hao Wang, Zhina Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hao WangSchool of Business, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China.
Zhina WangSchool of Business, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although many studies in developing countries have paid attention to the importance of rural energy transition, the significance of the healthcare system in the energy transition process has not received sufficient attention. This study investigates whether and how participation in the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS) affects rural household clean energy consumption. Methods: Using panel data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) for 2018 and 2020, covering 8,427 rural households across 29 provinces, we employ fixed- effects and instrumental variable models to address potential endogeneity. Results: The results show that NRCMS participation significantly increases the probability of adopting clean energy by approximately 2.8 percentage points. Mechanism analysis indicates that the effect operates primarily through wealth effect (reducing medical burden) and the health effect, while the precautionary savings channel is not supported. The heterogeneity analysis shows that households with low expenditure pressure are more likely to be incentivized by the NRCMS to consume clean energy than those with a larger number of unmarried members. Similarly, households with a smaller share of migrant workers are more likely to increase clean energy consumption after participating in the NRCMS than those with a larger share. Furthermore, for every one unit increase in regional medical resource endowment, the promoting effect of the NRCMS participation on rural household clean energy consumption increases by 0. 016 units. Discussion: These findings provide new insights for improving the rural medical insurance system and accelerating the transformation of rural energy consumption.

Indexed as

Insurance, HealthRural PopulationChinaHumanshealth insurancemedical resource endowmentrural householdssocial securitysustainable energy transformation

Identifiers

PMID42518565
PMCPMC13381183

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.