ArticleMagnetic resonance letters2027
Predictions and cross-center validation of IDH status and 1p/19q status in adult diffuse glioma with non-invasive magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Article in Magnetic resonance letters, 2027. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study developed and validated a non-invasive multi-metabolite magnetic resonance spectroscopy framework for preoperative molecular subtyping of adult diffuse gliomas. Using a cross-center, cross-vendor cohort of 268 patients, 48 features derived from 18 metabolites were systematically evaluated to identify discriminative metabolic signatures for predicting IDH mutation and 1p/19q codeletion status. The integrated metabolic model showed robust intra-center and cross-center performance for IDH prediction, with AUCs of 0.906 and 0.857, respectively, and for 1p/19q prediction, with AUCs of 0.858 and 0.787, respectively. These results suggest that synergistic metabolic profiling support molecular assessment in patients who may not be suitable for invasive biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.