ArticleSurgery open science2026
Assessment of infiltrative margins in subcutaneous soft-tissue sarcomas using ultrasonography and gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging.
Article in Surgery open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) aids in detecting infiltrative growth; however, preoperative determination of the extent of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) infiltration remains challenging. Ultrasonography could also detect infiltration effectively. We investigated the usefulness of MRI and ultrasonography as preoperative assessments for infiltrative STS. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 24 patients with subcutaneous infiltrative STS. Infiltrative length was measured using gadolinium-enhanced fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (GdFsT1) (M-IL) and ultrasonography (U-IL). The reactive layer was set at a greater distance of M-IL or U-IL. The surgical margin was set at greater distance of 2 cm from the tumor edge or 1.5 cm beyond the reactive layer. Histological infiltrative length (H-IL) and histological surgical margin length (H-margin) were measured using specimens. Relationships among M-IL, U-IL, and H-IL were analyzed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficients. Clinical outcomes, such as overall survival (OS) and local recurrence (LR), were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method. In 19 of 64 directions, H-IL was wider than M-IL. Among the 19 directions, U-IL was wider than H-IL in 11 directions, whereas H-IL was wider than U-IL in 8 directions. Mean H-margin was 29 mm, and the margin was negative in all directions. Spearman's correlation revealed weak associations between H-IL and M-IL (ρ = 0.08,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.