ArticleACS omega2026
Smartphone Determination of Formaldehyde in Milk and Cosmetics Samples Using Gas-Diffusion Microextraction Devices Prepared by 3D Printing.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study reports the development of a low-cost direct method for determining formaldehyde in milk and cosmetic samples. Formaldehyde was extracted from the samples using a 3D-printed gas-diffusion microextraction module, and detection was performed with a smartphone coupled to the module for colorimetric analysis. An algorithm was created in MATLAB to automate data processing. Formaldehyde was extracted from milk by acidifying the solution and exploiting the salting-out effect. Analytical curves for different types of milk (whole, skim, semiskim, lactose-free, and ultrahigh-temperature-processed) were generated using smartphone-based detection and compared with those obtained using a traditional UV/Vis spectrophotometer. A cosmetic sample used in this research was a straightening hair cream, quantified using the standard addition calibration method. The formaldehyde concentration in the straightening hair cream was determined from smartphone images to be 0.149% (w/w), whereas the spectrophotometric method yielded 0.144% (w/w). To evaluate the method's accuracy, a headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS) method was developed and applied to quantify the samples using the standard addition method. The accuracy of the proposed method exceeded 90% when compared with digital image data obtained using chromatographic and spectrophotometric methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.