Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42518486›Full record

ArticleACS omega2026

Smartphone Determination of Formaldehyde in Milk and Cosmetics Samples Using Gas-Diffusion Microextraction Devices Prepared by 3D Printing.

Juliana Casanova Pinho, Gabriel Baroffaldi Piassalonga, Saidy Cristina Ayala-Durán, João Pedro Silva, Josias Merib, Jared L Anderson, Maria Valnice Boldrin Zanoni, Paulo Clairmont Feitosa de Lima Gomes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juliana Casanova PinhoSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, National Institute for Alternative Technologies of Detection, Toxicological Evaluation, and Removal of Micropollutants and Radioactives (INCT-DATREM), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo 14800-060, Brazil.
Gabriel Baroffaldi PiassalongaSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, National Institute for Alternative Technologies of Detection, Toxicological Evaluation, and Removal of Micropollutants and Radioactives (INCT-DATREM), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo 14800-060, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4129-9555
Saidy Cristina Ayala-DuránSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, National Institute for Alternative Technologies of Detection, Toxicological Evaluation, and Removal of Micropollutants and Radioactives (INCT-DATREM), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo 14800-060, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6311-891X
João Pedro SilvaSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, National Institute for Alternative Technologies of Detection, Toxicological Evaluation, and Removal of Micropollutants and Radioactives (INCT-DATREM), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo 14800-060, Brazil.
Josias MeribUniversidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil; Programa de Pós-graduação em Biociências e Departamento de Farmacociências, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90050-170, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5107-6943
Jared L AndersonDepartment of Chemistry, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-8752
Maria Valnice Boldrin ZanoniSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, National Institute for Alternative Technologies of Detection, Toxicological Evaluation, and Removal of Micropollutants and Radioactives (INCT-DATREM), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo 14800-060, Brazil.
Paulo Clairmont Feitosa de Lima GomesSao Paulo State University (UNESP), Institute of Chemistry, Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry, National Institute for Alternative Technologies of Detection, Toxicological Evaluation, and Removal of Micropollutants and Radioactives (INCT-DATREM), São Paulo State University (UNESP), Araraquara, São Paulo 14800-060, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4837-6352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study reports the development of a low-cost direct method for determining formaldehyde in milk and cosmetic samples. Formaldehyde was extracted from the samples using a 3D-printed gas-diffusion microextraction module, and detection was performed with a smartphone coupled to the module for colorimetric analysis. An algorithm was created in MATLAB to automate data processing. Formaldehyde was extracted from milk by acidifying the solution and exploiting the salting-out effect. Analytical curves for different types of milk (whole, skim, semiskim, lactose-free, and ultrahigh-temperature-processed) were generated using smartphone-based detection and compared with those obtained using a traditional UV/Vis spectrophotometer. A cosmetic sample used in this research was a straightening hair cream, quantified using the standard addition calibration method. The formaldehyde concentration in the straightening hair cream was determined from smartphone images to be 0.149% (w/w), whereas the spectrophotometric method yielded 0.144% (w/w). To evaluate the method's accuracy, a headspace gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-GC-MS) method was developed and applied to quantify the samples using the standard addition method. The accuracy of the proposed method exceeded 90% when compared with digital image data obtained using chromatographic and spectrophotometric methods.

Identifiers

PMID42518486
PMCPMC13382816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.