ArticleACS omega2026
Protocol for Membrane Permeability Prediction of Cyclic Peptides Using Descriptors Obtained from Extended Ensemble Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Chemical Structures.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Improving the membrane permeability is crucial in cyclic peptide drug discovery. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations are widely used to analyze membrane permeability but are computationally expensive. Machine learning offers a low-cost alternative, but its performance is limited by the size of available experimental data sets and the difficulty of incorporating peptide-specific three-dimensional (3D) structural information. Although the 3D conformations of cyclic peptides are closely associated with membrane permeability, they are highly sensitive to subtle changes in the chemical structure. Therefore, we developed a machine learning protocol that combines 3D descriptors derived from conformations obtained by MD simulations with 2D descriptors derived from cyclic peptide chemical structures, aiming to improve generalizability while reducing the simulation cost relative to the direct MD-based permeability prediction. We targeted 252 peptides across four data sets and calculated 3D descriptors from peptide conformations sampled outside the membrane, at the water/membrane interface, and in the membrane using replica exchange with solute tempering/replica exchange umbrella sampling simulations with 16 replicas. For machine learning, six different algorithms were used, ranging from simple methods, such as ridge regression, to more sophisticated methods, such as XGBoost. The best prediction performance was obtained using XGBoost, with Pearson's correlation coefficient
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.