ArticleObesity pillars2026
Obesity and pelvic organ prolapse: Review.
Article in Obesity pillars, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Obesity is a major public health challenge with substantial effects on women's health and quality of life. Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), characterized by the descent of pelvic organs into the vaginal canal, is influenced by both obesity-related mechanical forces and molecular alterations. This review aimed to evaluate the relationship between obesity and POP, with particular emphasis on etiopathogenesis, clinical consequences, and implications for prevention and treatment strategies. Methods: This was a narrative review of the literature examining the relationship between obesity and pelvic organ prolapse. A literature search was performed using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases. Relevant studies addressing obesity, pelvic organ prolapse, extracellular matrix remodeling, genetic susceptibility, epigenetic mechanisms, inflammation, and surgical outcomes were reviewed and synthesized. The available evidence was evaluated with respect to mechanical loading, connective tissue alterations, molecular pathways, and clinical implications. Results: Increased intra-abdominal pressure resulting from visceral adiposity was identified as a major mechanical factor contributing to pelvic floor weakening. In addition, obesity was found to influence extracellular matrix remodeling through altered collagen metabolism, adipokine imbalance, chronic inflammation, and epigenetic modifications. These mechanisms may contribute to the development and progression of POP, complicate surgical management, and increase the risk of recurrence. Current evidence also suggests that genetic susceptibility and connective tissue disorders may amplify the effects of obesity on pelvic floor dysfunction. Conclusions: Obesity represents both an important risk factor and a therapeutic challenge in pelvic organ prolapse, adversely affecting women's quality of life. Understanding the interaction between mechanical, molecular, genetic, and epigenetic mechanisms may facilitate individualized prevention and management strategies for women with obesity. Further clinical and translational studies are needed to clarify these mechanisms and support the development of personalized approaches to POP prevention and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.