ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2026
Modeling human observer performance with neural network observers in a forced localization task using undersampled MRI images.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Modelling human performance in forced localization tasks is a challenge for model observers because of the many possible signal locations along with capturing human perception. This is particularly challenging when using anatomical images and needing generalization to out-of-distribution images such as in varying undersampling in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In this study, we modeled human forced localization (FL) performance using images with varied percentage of low frequencies fully collected in 5× MRI undersampling, ranging from 0% (aliasing) to 20% (blurring). We used a modified EfficientNet-B1 architecture trained to directly predict coordinates (FLNet) as well as using a biologically inspired V1Block, which incorporates Gabor filters to mimic early stages of human visual processing as a preprocessing to FLNet (V1FLNet). When trained on images with 20% of low frequencies collected, both neural networks surpassed average human performance but diverged from human-like performance on out-of-distribution data. Training on both 0% and 20% data, leading to interpolation in the generalization and more training data led to better results. Training on all the conditions resulted in the best results which also matched human performance and would lead to the same choice of which low k-space frequencies to collect as the human observer studies. The adaptive models, trained and evaluated across each of the seven conditions, performed better than the model trained on one condition but not as well as the model trained on all conditions. V1FLNet had similar performance as FLNet especially for the model that used all conditions for training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.