ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Distribution-based covariate assessment using wasserstein distance in population pharmacokinetic models.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Population pharmacokinetic modeling relies on adequate covariate specification to explain interindividual variability and support model-informed precision dosing. Current validation methods predominantly use likelihood-based criteria and correlation analyses, which may fail to detect complex non-linear or non-monotonic covariate relationships. We propose the Wasserstein distance, derived from optimal transport theory, as a complementary distribution-based metric for covariate specification assessment. Methods: Using high-dose methotrexate pharmacokinetic data from 50 patients with lymphoid malignancies, we developed three nested population models: BASE (no covariates), GENET_ALL (ABCC2 -24C>T polymorphism), and FINAL (genetic plus creatinine clearance). We computed Wasserstein distances between empirical distributions of individual parameter deviations stratified by covariate groups, with statistical significance assessed via permutation testing. We defined a Wasserstein-based R Results: In the FINAL model, both CT01 (W = 0.071, p = 0.741) and creatinine clearance showed no residual distributional differences, confirming adequate specification. The Wasserstein-based R Conclusion: Wasserstein distance provides a complementary distribution-based framework with limited parametric assumptions for validating covariate specification in population pharmacokinetic models, provided that eta-shrinkage remains sufficiently low when using empirical Bayes estimates. This approach is particularly useful for detecting complex non-linear relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.