ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Classification of neurodevelopmental disorders and typical development using deep learning and a portable patch-type electroencephalography device.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are common neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in children and often co-occur (ASD + ADHD), complicating the diagnosis. The diagnostic process is lengthy and subjective, relying heavily on expert knowledge, which limits accessibility. Electroencephalography (EEG) offers potential as a biomarker but requires skilled technicians for measurements and can be stressful for children with NDDs. This study aimed to provide a more accessible diagnostic support tool. We used a portable EEG device with a low participant burden and a deep learning model to distinguish between the typical development group (TD) and the NDD group, comprising children with ASD, ADHD, and ASD + ADHD. Resting-state EEG data were recorded for 5 min using the portable HARU-2 device, which features three channels placed on the forehead of 163 participants (87 TD, 76 NDD). A deep learning model combining a one-dimensional convolutional neural network and a transformer encoder was developed to analyze the EEG data. In 5-fold cross-validation, the model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.713 and a balanced accuracy (bACC) of 67.5% for classifying NDD and TD. Exploratory evaluation of out-of-fold predictions stratified by clinical phenotype showed an AUC of 0.793 and bACC of 75.0% for ASD vs. TD, 0.817 and 79.5% for ADHD vs. TD, and 0.667 and 62.7% for ASD + ADHD vs. TD. These findings suggest that portable EEG devices combined with deep learning models may serve as accessible adjunctive tools for NDD screening in children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.