ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2026
Theory for Identification and Inference with Synthetic Controls: A Proximal Causal Inference Framework.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imperfect Synthetic Controls.Journal of applied econometrics (Chichester, England) · 2026Article
- Doubly robust proximal synthetic controls.Biometrics · 2024Article
- Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators.Journal of econometrics · 2024Article
- The State of Use and Utility of Negative Controls in Pharmacoepidemiologic Studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Review
- Double Negative Control Inference in Test-Negative Design Studies of Vaccine Effectiveness.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024Article
- INTRODUCING PROXIMAL CAUSAL INFERENCE FOR EPIDEMIOLOGISTS.American journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Double Negative Control Inference in Test-Negative Design Studies of Vaccine Effectiveness.ArXiv · 2023Article
- RE: "SYNTHETIC CONTROL METHODS FOR THE EVALUATION OF SINGLE-UNIT INTERVENTIONS IN EPIDEMIOLOGY: A TUTORIAL".American journal of epidemiology · 2022Article
- Synthetic Control Methodology for Examining Firearm Policy.Current epidemiology reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Synthetic control (SC) methods are commonly used to estimate the treatment effect on a single treated unit in panel data settings. An SC is a weighted average of control units built to match the treated unit, with weights typically estimated by regressing pretreatment outcomes and measured covariates of the treated unit to those of the control units. However, the classical SC method was primarily proposed for empirical settings where a good pretreatment fit is attainable. In this article, we introduce a proximal causal inference framework to formalize identification and inference for both the SC and ultimately the treatment effect on the treated, based on the observation that control units not contributing to the construction of an SC can be repurposed as proxies of latent confounders, thus, extending the applicability of SC methods to cases where the pretreatment fit is poor even with many pretreatment periods. We show that several existing uncertainty quantification methods of treatment effect for the classical SC methods can be adapted to the proximal inference approach. The proposed framework can accommodate nonlinear models, which allows for binary and count outcomes both of which remain understudied in the SC literature. We illustrate with comprehensive simulation studies and an application to the evaluation of the 1990 German Reunification. Supplementary materials for this article are available online, including a standardized description of the materials available for reproducing the work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.