ArticleTree physiology2026
Optimization of ascorbate and glutathione assays for woody perennial bud tissues: overcoming matrix effects and storage instability.
Article in Tree physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantifying ascorbate (ASC) and glutathione (GSH) in woody perennial tissues presents significant methodological challenges due to complex tissue matrices and the lability of these redox-active metabolites. We adapted established enzymatic microplate assays for ASC and GSH quantification to mature dormant grapevine buds, a structure containing protective scales, hairs and lignified components. Key optimizations included: (i) use of 1 M HClO₄ rather than 0.2 M HCl for effective enzyme inactivation and matrix disruption; (ii) sample-to-solvent ratios of 1:10 to 1:15; and (iii) extended centrifugation to effectively sediment organic components. Standard addition experiments revealed significant matrix effects, with recovery of ~80% for ASC and 65% for GSH. The optimized method successfully determined >90% reduction status for both metabolites in mature buds. Critically, we observed severe ASC instability during frozen storage, with ~80% loss of ASC after 4 months at -80 °C, while GSH remained stable. These findings underscore the necessity of immediate analysis for ASC quantification in woody tissues and provide a validated protocol for studying redox metabolism in perennial bud tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.